Site icon Dataworks Educational Research

Tech Vision 2: The Who, How, and What of Learning

netp2010-execsumm_Page_01As mentioned in Part 1, the National Education Technology Plan was announced in November 2010 by the U.S. Department of Education.  It is a broad vision for where schools and districts can go in adopting technology for learning.  In this post, we want to look more closely at three points referred to in the plan’s first goal about learning – Who needs to learn, How people learn, and What needs to be learned.

Who Needs to Learn

The NETP includes a section explaining how technology can make education more available to all citizens.  The Plan suggests making learning experiences accessible to all learners through something called universal design principles.  This is especially important for low-income and minority learners, for English language learners, and for learners with disabilities.

The Plan cites three Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles, which are based on decades of research:

The idea is to develop technology that meets these design principles. All teachers and administrators should keep this in mind as they build the “digital environment” for their schools. Some examples mentioned include: extended hours for use of networked computers in schools, libraries, etc.; using advanced translation technology for multiple languages; and assistive technologies, such as electronic mobility switches, alternative keyboards, computer-screen enlargers, text-to-speech readers, sign language avatars, and more.

How People Learn

The Plan describes some of the latest brain science and how that applies to the use of technology in education.  Three parts of the brain are seen as governing three types of learning. The posterior brain region where senses transform information into usable knowledge is focused on declarative or factual knowledge. The frontal part of the brain which deals with how things are done and performed is focused on procedural knowledge. The interior/central brain regions, which are specialized for affective and emotional learning, are focused on why things are important to us, also known as motivation.

With this understanding, then technology can be developed to enhance each type of knowledge.

Even without technology, well-crafted lessons should utilize this knowledge of the brain. DataWORKS’ READY TO TEACH Lessons use Skill Development to work with procedural knowledge, use graphic organizers to work with declarative knowledge, and use a Relevance component to explain the importance of a lesson. The addition of advanced technology to such lessons builds on good research, and adds new dimensions to the learning.

What People Need to Learn

The Plan states that we are still evolving our understanding of what it means to be a 21st –century learner, but in the meantime, we need to use technology to be productive.  The Plan references the National Educational Technology Standards for Students (NETS-S) developed by the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).  Interestingly, the ISTE also has Technology Standards for Teachers, Administrators, and Coaches.

The Plan notes that other researchers have also developed standards, but suggests that all standards fall into three broad categories that we need proficiency in:

As we forge ahead with technology, the Plan notes that we can’t know everything in one lifetime, that people will change jobs throughout their lives, and that students need to know how to use the same technology that professionals use in their work.  The Plan notes that this requires “adaptive learning skills” which are different from the “broad but shallow exposure that is the norm in our education system today.” This means that students need to be able to go deep into any field of knowledge and make connections across fields. This is the skill that best defines the 21st-century learner.

How we educate students – and ourselves, for that matter – with technology, for technology, and through technology will determine how American education advances or falls behind in every field of knowledge.  That’s why this Plan is an important blueprint for individual, school, and national growth.

In future posts, we’ll look at the big ideas in each of the other goals of this comprehensive plan.

Do you agree that this Plan covers the right Who, How, and What of learning? Which areas are most important for our future? Discuss your ideas in the comments section below.

Exit mobile version